A stone seal bearing the name of one of the families who acted as servants in the First Temple and then returned to Jerusalem after being exiled to Babylonia has been uncovered in an archeological excavation in Jerusalem's City of David, a prominent Israeli archeologist said Wednesday.The 2,500-year-old black stone seal, which has the name "Temech" engraved on it, was found earlier this week amid stratified debris in the excavation under way just outside the Old City walls near the Dung Gate, said archeologist Dr. Eilat Mazar, who is leading the dig.
According to the Book of Nehemiah, the Temech family were servants of the First Temple and were sent into exile to Babylon following its destruction by the Babylonians in 586 BCE.
...The 2.1 x 1.8-cm. elliptical seal is engraved with two bearded priests standing on either side of an incense altar with their hands raised forward in a position of worship.
A crescent moon, the symbol of the chief Babylonian god Sin, appears on the top of the altar.
There is more there.
The reference in Ezra and Nechemia is actually to Temach, rather than Temech, but there are obviously no vowels on the seal. Or at least we assume the name is Temach, for the name occurs both times at the end of the pasuk, and so it is in pausal form, and is written Tamach, with a kamatz under the Tav and a patach under the Mem. We see it in Nechemiah 7:55:
מו הַנְּתִינִים: בְּנֵי-צִחָא בְנֵי-חֲשֻׂפָא, בְּנֵי טַבָּעוֹת. | 46 The Nethinim: the children of Ziha, the children of Hasupha, the children of Tabbaoth; |
נה בְּנֵי {ר} בַרְקוֹס {ס} בְּנֵי-סִיסְרָא, {ס} בְּנֵי-תָמַח. {ס} | 55 the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Temah; |
ס כָּל-הַנְּתִינִים--וּבְנֵי, עַבְדֵי שְׁלֹמֹה: שְׁלֹשׁ מֵאוֹת, תִּשְׁעִים וּשְׁנָיִם. {פ} | 60 All the Nethinim, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two. {P} |
נג בְּנֵי-בַרְקוֹס {ס} בְּנֵי-סִיסְרָא, {ס} בְּנֵי {ר} תָמַח. {ס} | 53 the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Temah; |
There is actually a third reference, in Nechemia 13:14, but it would seem to be a verb:
According to the Talmud, the Netinim were Giveonim. We find their joining Israel earlier in Yehoshua 9:
II Shmuel 21:
In Yevamot 78b - 79a we read:
David said: As to Saul, there have already elapsed the twelve months of the [first] year and it would be unusual to arrange for his mourning now. As to the nethinim, however, let them be summoned and we shall pacify them. Immediately the king called the Gibeonites, and said unto them … 'What shall I do for you? and wherewith should I make atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord'? And the Gibeonites said to him: 'It is no matter of silver or gold between us and Saul, or his house,' neither is it for us [to put] any man etc. … Let seven men of his sons be delivered unto us and we will hang them up unto the Lord etc.' He tried to pacify them but they would not be pacified. Thereupon he said to them: This nation is distinguished by three characteristics: They are merciful, bashful and benevolent. 'Merciful', for is is written, And shew thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee. 'Bashful', for it is written, That His fear may be before you. 'Benevolent', for it is written, That he may command his children and his household etc. Only he who cultivates these three characteristics is fit to join this nation.The result of all this is that the Netinim, or Gibeonite converts and their descendants, had the halachic status akin to that of bastards.
Perhaps it is not so surprising that they would be willing to have a seal with the Babylonian moon god Sin represented upon it.
6 comments:
The page is actually here:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1200475897717&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
thanks!
What's surprising is that moongod-worshippers, not just "frummies", would want to return with Ezra/Nehemiah.
On second thought, given the success of secular Zionism, maybe this shouldn't be a surprise. Though I can't explain why it would happen that way.
I would suggest one of two answers:
1) If they were Netinim, given over to the Leviim, it is possible that they did not have much choice in the matter.
2) IIRC the gemara makes a similar observation. In Asara Yuchsin, it is specifically those such as mamzerim, netinim, shtukis, bedukis, etc, who came from Bavel, since there was not so much for them in society in Bavel, and they could make a new life there, in Eretz Yisrael.
Kol Tuv,
Josh
" If they were Netinim, given over to the Leviim, it is possible that they did not have much choice in the matter."
You'd think that they would be dancing in joy at the destruction of the Beit HaMikdash and been like "so-long suckers!"
It this particular theory I posited above (in 1 rather than 2), they were servants. It is unclear that even people going into exile would be forced to give up their servants. In which case the Netinim would still not have much choice in the matter, and would not have been able to do and say that.
Or perhaps not.
Post a Comment