Monday, October 12, 2009

Bereishit sources

by aliyah
rishon (Bereishit 1:1)
sheni (2:4)
shlishi (2:20)
revii (3:22)
chamishi (4:19)
shishi (5:1)
shvii (5:25)
maftir (6:5)
haftara (Yeshaya 42)

by perek
perek 1 ; perek 2 ; perek 3 ; perek 4 ; perek 5 ; perek 6

meforshim
Shadal (here and here)
Mishtadel
Daat -- with Rashi, Ramban, Seforno, Ibn Ezra, Rashbam, Rabbenu Bachya, Midrash Rabba, Tanchuma+, Gilyonot
Gilyonot Nechama Leibovitz (Hebrew)
Tiferes Yehonasan from Rav Yonasan Eibeshitz
Chasdei Yehonasan -- nothing on parshat Bereishit
Toldos Yizchak Acharon, repeated from Rav Yonasan Eibeshutz

Divrei Yehonasan
Even Shleimah -- from Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Ehrenreich
R' Saadia Gaon's Tafsir, Arabic translation of Torah (here and here)
Zohar, with English translation
Baal Haturim (HaAruch)
Imrei Shafer, Rav Shlomo Kluger
Sefer Zikaron of Ritva

The following meforshim at JNUL:
Ralbag (6)
Shach (5)
Aharon ben Yosef the Karaite (11)

rashi
Daat, Rashi In Hebrew (perek 1)
Judaica Press Rashi in English and Hebrew
Mizrachi, Mizrachi (3, JNUL)
Gur Aryeh (Maharal of Prague)
Maharsha
Siftei Chachamim
Berliner's Beur on Rashi
Commentary on Rashi by Yosef of Krasnitz
R' Yisrael Isserlin (on Rashi, 2, JNUL)
Two supercommentaries on Rashi, by Chasdai Almosnino and Yaakov Kneizel
Rav Natan ben Shishon Shapira Ashkenazi (16th century), (JNUL, pg 2)
Taz
Levush HaOrah
Mohar`al
Yeriot Shlomo (Maharshal)
Moda L'Bina (Wolf Heidenheim)
Dikdukei Rashi
Mekorei Rashi (in Mechokekei Yehuda)
Bartenura
Meam Loez -- laazei Rashi
Also see Mikraos Gedolos above, which has Rashi with Sifsei Chachamim

ramban
Daat, Ramban in Hebrew (perek 1)
R' Yitzchak Abohav's on Ramban (standalone and in a Tanach opposite Ramban)
Kesef Mezukak
Kanfei Nesharim
Rabbi Meir Abusaula (student of Rashba)


ibn ezra
Daat, Ibn Ezra in Hebrew (perek 1)
Mechokekei Yehudah (Daat)
Mechokekei Yehudah (HebrewBooks)
Mavaser Ezra
R' Shmuel Motot (on Ibn Ezra, pg 4, JNUL)
Ibn Kaspi's supercommentary on Ibn Ezra, different from his commentary (here and here)
Mekor Chaim, Ohel Yosef, Motot
Avi Ezer
Also see Mikraos Gedolos above, which has Ibn Ezra with Avi Ezer

targum
Targum Onkelos opposite Torah text
Targum Onkelos and Targum Pseudo-Yonatan in English
Shadal's Ohev Ger on Targum Onkelos
Avnei Tzion -- two commentaries on Onkelos
Bei`urei Onkelos
Or Hatargum on Onkelos
Targum Yonatan
Commentary on Targum Yonatan and Targum Yerushalmi
Septuagint (Greek, English)
Origen's Hexapla (JNUL)

masorah

Tanach with masoretic notes on the side
Commentary on the Masorah
Minchas Shai
Or Torah
Taamei Masoret
Masoret HaKeriah
Shiluv Hamasorot
Rama (but based on alphabet, not parsha)

midrash
Midrash Rabba at Daat (1)
Midrash Tanchuma at Daat (1)
Bereishit Rabba, with commentaries
Midrash Tanchuma with commentary of Etz Yosef and Anaf Yosef
Commentary on Midrash Rabba by R' Naftali Hirtz b'R' Menachem
Matat-Kah on Midrash Rabba
Nefesh Yehonasan by Rav Yonasan Eibeshutz

haftarah (Yeshaya 42:5)
In a chumash, with perush of Ibn Ezra and Malbim.
In a standalone Mikraos Gedolos, with Targum, Rashi, Mahari Kara, Radak, Ibn Ezra, Metzudat David.
Haftarah in Gutnick Edition
Rashis in English
Daat, which includes Yalkut Shimoni, Radak, Gilyonot
Ibn Janach
Ibn Kaspi
Ahavas Yehonatan by Rav Yonasan Eibeshutz
Aharon ben Yosef the Karaite

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I posted this earlier but I think it is more approriate here
1)It says KI TOIV,but why not by the creation of man?
2)Why does it say KI TOIV by the seperation Between Light and Dark if seperation is bad?
3)It says that a Tzaddik is never Nichshal a food that is Assur if so why did Adam eat from the Eitz Hadas?

joshwaxman said...

Don't know. But some guesses off the top of my head.
1) Perhaps it goes on the creations of the day, and there is already a comprehensive looking over all the creations at the end of the sixth.
2) Perhaps not all separation is bad. E.g. kedusha is defined elsewhere as separation from arayos.
3) Perhaps this is a question only according to the midrash that Chava tricked him into eating it (e.g. presenting it to him as grape juice). But according to the midrashim that she argued with him until he agreed, or that she cried and he ate it, all with full awareness, then this principle does not apply to intentional actions....

Kol Tuv,
Josh

Anonymous said...

There is an answer to 3 in the sefer Pilpulie Charifta On chumash long and involved if anyone is intrested involves three gemaras if i feel the need maybe I will write it up

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin