This is what Shadal cited about Hevel:
ב] את הבל : לדעת קליריקוס נקרא כן אחרי מותו, כי היתה מציאותו הבל
Thus, Clericus asserts that this was not Hevel's name when Hevel was alive, but rather that he was called this after death, for he came to naught.
There is an unspoken, non-explicit impetus for this explanation. Besides that it is quite "lucky" for one named Hevel to come to this end -- and the same for Machlon and Kilyon, Er and Onan -- the unspoken impetus may be found in the pesukim, in Bereishit 4:
And indeed, Hevel, Machlon, Kilyon, Er, and Onan all died without having children.
Also, perhaps we can say that the etyomology is Hevel is given in the aforementioned pasuk, in 25: תַּחַת הֶבֶל כִּי הֲרָגוֹ קָיִן.
The problem with saying this with Er and Onan is that mother and father named them. As we have in Bereishit 38:
It might be readable into Machlon and Kilyon in the first perek of Rut.
There is an unspoken, non-explicit impetus for this explanation. Besides that it is quite "lucky" for one named Hevel to come to this end -- and the same for Machlon and Kilyon, Er and Onan -- the unspoken impetus may be found in the pesukim, in Bereishit 4:
And indeed, Hevel, Machlon, Kilyon, Er, and Onan all died without having children.
Also, perhaps we can say that the etyomology is Hevel is given in the aforementioned pasuk, in 25: תַּחַת הֶבֶל כִּי הֲרָגוֹ קָיִן.
The problem with saying this with Er and Onan is that mother and father named them. As we have in Bereishit 38:
It might be readable into Machlon and Kilyon in the first perek of Rut.
1 comment:
I heard from someone at Gush that Machlon and Kilyon are positive names, derived from machol=dance and klilah=perfection respectively. And only now when the word frequency in Hebrew has shifted do the names remind us of sickness and death. Sound reasonable?
Post a Comment