Over at Hirhurim, R' Gil has aninteresting
response (detailing how the commentators understand the verses) to Dr. Mordechai Cogan's
citation of King Shlomo's gift to Chiram as a precedent and
halachic justification for disengagement.
The relevant psukim, in
Melachim Aleph 9:10:
|
י וַיְהִי, מִקְצֵה עֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה, אֲשֶׁר-בָּנָה שְׁלֹמֹה, אֶת-שְׁנֵי הַבָּתִּים--אֶת-בֵּית יְהוָה, וְאֶת-בֵּית הַמֶּלֶךְ. | 10 And it came to pass at the end of twenty years, wherein Solomon had built the two houses, the house of the LORD and the king's house-- |
יא חִירָם מֶלֶךְ-צֹר נִשָּׂא אֶת-שְׁלֹמֹה בַּעֲצֵי אֲרָזִים וּבַעֲצֵי בְרוֹשִׁים, וּבַזָּהָב--לְכָל-חֶפְצוֹ; אָז יִתֵּן הַמֶּלֶךְ שְׁלֹמֹה לְחִירָם, עֶשְׂרִים עִיר, בְּאֶרֶץ, הַגָּלִיל. | 11 now Hiram the king of Tyre had furnished Solomon with cedar-trees and cypress-trees, and with gold, according to all his desire--that then king Solomon gave Hiram twenty cities in the land of Galilee. |
יב וַיֵּצֵא חִירָם, מִצֹּר, לִרְאוֹת אֶת-הֶעָרִים, אֲשֶׁר נָתַן-לוֹ שְׁלֹמֹה; וְלֹא יָשְׁרוּ, בְּעֵינָיו. | 12 And Hiram came out from Tyre to see the cities which Solomon had given him: and they pleased him not. |
יג וַיֹּאמֶר--מָה הֶעָרִים הָאֵלֶּה, אֲשֶׁר-נָתַתָּה לִּי אָחִי; וַיִּקְרָא לָהֶם אֶרֶץ כָּבוּל, עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה. | 13 And he said: 'What cities are these which thou hast given me, my brother?' And they were called the land of Cabul, unto this day. {P} |
I would just add to this they gemara's discussion of these
psukim, which we will encounter very soon in
daf yomi. From
Shabbat 54a:
EWES MAY GO OUT TIED [KEBULOTH].
What is KEBULOTH?
With their tails tied downwards, to restrain the males from copulating with them. How is it implied that kabul denotes non-productively?
Because it is written (Melachim Aleph 9:13)
יג וַיֹּאמֶר--מָה הֶעָרִים הָאֵלֶּה, אֲשֶׁר-נָתַתָּה לִּי אָחִי; וַיִּקְרָא לָהֶם אֶרֶץ כָּבוּל, עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה. | 13 And he said: 'What cities are these which thou hast given me, my brother?' And they were called the land of Cabul, unto this day. |
What is 'the land of Cabul'?
Said Rav Huna: It contained inhabitants who were smothered [mekubbolin] with silver and gold.
Said Rava to him, If so, is that why it is written {in the previous verse}, 'and they pleased him not?'
Because they were smothered with silver and gold they pleased him not?!
Even so, he replied; being wealthy and soft-living, they would do no work.
Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said, It was a sandy region.
{Jastrow: the land of Humton, a district of northern Palestine}
And why was it called Cabul?
Because the leg sinks into it up to the ankle, and people designate it an ankle-bound land which produces no fruit.
All of this fits in nicely, I think, with Abarbenel's understanding (mentioned by Gil) that it is the annual bounty of these cities, as opposed to sovereignty, that Shlomo gave Chiram.
No comments:
Post a Comment