From the AP article:
A court Wednesday acquitted a 92-year-old retired archaeologist who was put on trial for writing in a book that Islamic-style head scarves date back more than 5,000 years - several millennia before the birth of Islam - and were worn by priestesses who initiated young men into sex.Muazzez Ilmiye Cig, an expert on the ancient Sumerian civilization of Mesopotamia, which arose around the third millennium B.C., was the latest person to go on trial in Turkey for expressing opinions, despite intense European Union pressure on the country to expand freedom of expression.
They would have presumably put Moshe Rabbenu on trial. From parshat Vayeshev, in Bereishit 38:14:
יט וַתָּקָם וַתֵּלֶךְ, וַתָּסַר צְעִיפָהּ מֵעָלֶיהָ; וַתִּלְבַּשׁ, בִּגְדֵי אַלְמְנוּתָהּ. | 19 And she arose, and went away, and put off her veil from her, and put on the garments of her widowhood. |
though a midrash (famous, cited by Rashi) reinterprets pasuk 15 and explains she covered her face while in Yehuda's house -- כִּי כִסְּתָה, פָּנֶיהָ. How that works out with the various pesukim, I'm not going to get into here.
As an aside, I thought I saw somewhere that nowadays they actually have reversed from that initial position, and nowadays do not claim that temple priestesses (heirodules) had intercourse with worshippers as part of the service.
No comments:
Post a Comment