tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post4181254283677120768..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: The chronological problem in the saving of Moshejoshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-22594534118904638212011-01-01T21:59:12.721-05:002011-01-01T21:59:12.721-05:00by the way, to expand on the *basis* of the joke, ...by the way, to expand on the *basis* of the joke, earlier we were grappling with different ways of understanding Amasa. Does it mean "her hand", "her cubit", or "her maidservant". This, then, proposes a fourth explanation. ;)<br />kt,<br />joshjoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-41983805442393720632010-12-30T22:31:31.523-05:002010-12-30T22:31:31.523-05:00your loss, i suppose. your original comment seemed...your loss, i suppose. your original comment seemed to realize it was a joke, but then not get it, in writing "It's very simple when ou take in the context of the pusek". ya think?!<br /><br />kt,<br />joshjoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-30861760420921827892010-12-30T22:05:56.568-05:002010-12-30T22:05:56.568-05:00Precisely,i'm deeply opposed to making jokes f...Precisely,i'm deeply opposed to making jokes from the torah.And it's not purim now,either.I oppose this type of letznus een on purim BTW.bnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-69118830983972306232010-12-30T18:02:39.678-05:002010-12-30T18:02:39.678-05:00you realized that it is a joke. what, then, is you...you realized that it is a joke. what, then, is your question?<br /><br />kt,<br />joshjoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-26788982707496326522010-12-30T17:36:47.452-05:002010-12-30T17:36:47.452-05:00What kind of joke is this?It's very simple whe...What kind of joke is this?It's very simple when ou take in the context of the pusek.No need for sephardi kriah.bnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-17727947486107183882010-01-11T19:32:15.672-05:002010-01-11T19:32:15.672-05:00and indeed, Moshe Rabbenu was sefardi.
;)
kt,
jo...and indeed, <a href="http://lifeinisrael.blogspot.com/2009/09/mashiach-will-be-sefardi-and-so-was.html" rel="nofollow">Moshe Rabbenu was sefardi</a>.<br /><br />;)<br /><br />kt,<br />joshjoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-50802643848748018232010-01-11T18:43:30.859-05:002010-01-11T18:43:30.859-05:00I guess Purim comes early in the Waxman house.
No...I guess Purim comes early in the Waxman house.<br /><br />Not a Kasha if you use Sephardic pronunciation, of course.yaakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08179304707239865515noreply@blogger.com