tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post3977587411414157383..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: Daf Yomi Megillah 28b: How Ulla Shows that Yerushalmi Seder Kodoshim is a Forgeryjoshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-67541010424234801162007-02-28T07:17:00.000-05:002007-02-28T07:17:00.000-05:00well, we kind of technically do, because we have Y...well, we kind of technically do, because we have Yerushalmi on Nidda (or at least some prakim of it), but not for the rest of taharot. In my accounting of this, I was assuming Ullah was not counting Niddah as a seder in and of itself. Does Rambam say that the rest of of taharot exists, or existed, or is it a general statement of such? Does he list which sedarim?<BR/><BR/>Thanks for bringing this point to my attention. I'll see what I can find about this.joshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-7616063479439236892007-02-27T19:21:00.000-05:002007-02-27T19:21:00.000-05:00According to an article by RYGB on the forged Sede...According to an article by RYGB on the forged Seder Kodshim, the Rambam explicitly says in PihM that we have (had) Yerushalmi on 5 sedarim.Josh M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14414532577328945154noreply@blogger.com