tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post3218635095541933635..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: Is darkness a separate entity, or simply absence of light? Science vs. proofs from gemarasjoshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-31495479833259351722010-01-24T21:38:17.640-05:002010-01-24T21:38:17.640-05:00"Very cool stuff"? Me thinks not.
"..."Very cool stuff"? Me thinks not.<br /><br />"The MEG has never been independently verified and there is no known working prototype."<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motionless_Electromagnetic_Generatorzachnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-86102297788508283952010-01-24T12:16:43.924-05:002010-01-24T12:16:43.924-05:00Hello Akiva, I like your blog too, neat stuff ther...Hello Akiva, I like your blog too, neat stuff there. Thanks for bringing that up. Tom Bearden at his website: http://www.cheniere.org/# has some interesting stuff on that as well. He points out the Nobel Prize awarded for the extraction process and he even has a patent out for just such a device, called the MEG (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator). You can view the patent from a link at his website or here: http://www.cheniere.org/references/MEG_Patent.pdf <br />it is a pdf file so you'll need Adobe to view it, but it's free if you or anyone didn't know it was.<br /><br />Very cool stuffChristopher Darren Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04538037046604165738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-69071981456316976522010-01-24T11:24:21.927-05:002010-01-24T11:24:21.927-05:00One other possibility that might fit is Zero Point...One other possibility that might fit is Zero Point Energy. It's a clearly measurable something (at the quantum physics level) that exists when there is nothing else around. (Measurable but not extractable or accessible.)<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia: Zero Point Energy</a>Akivahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13042484533217272945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-4014649235010781882010-01-24T00:32:46.043-05:002010-01-24T00:32:46.043-05:00I've always thought it was like this: http://...I've always thought it was like this: http://www.nightghost.ws/2009/07/light-darkness-its-all-light.html<br /><br />Just my humble opinion. LOL. I like reading your blog.<br /><br />Thank you.Christopher Darren Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04538037046604165738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-79518814031257975952010-01-23T19:26:14.318-05:002010-01-23T19:26:14.318-05:00indeed, my father suggested this same thing to me ...indeed, my father suggested this same thing to me before i posted it. and it is a good candidate for a separate creation of darkness. <br /><br />however, it would not fit into the Gra's words, nor into the Talmudic prooftexts, which are about regular darkness. and the Rambam et al are still surely correct about regular darkness and light...<br /><br />kt,<br />joshjoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-64047230115076623782010-01-23T13:06:08.337-05:002010-01-23T13:06:08.337-05:00Science currently postulates the existence of dark...Science currently postulates the existence of dark matter and (I love this one) dark energy. For the current cosmological models to work, 95% of the matter and energy in the universe must consist of these as-yet-not-understood materials.<br /><br />Assuming these postulates are true, dark energy would seem to fill the category of a separate creation of darkness.<br /><br />It would seem the final scientific word on this is not written yet.<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia: Dark Matter</a>Akivahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13042484533217272945noreply@blogger.com