tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post112001425452409252..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: Midrashic Methods #1: Ribbuy (Inclusion)joshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-1120072562116385402005-06-29T15:16:00.000-04:002005-06-29T15:16:00.000-04:00yaak:I typically use neither, trying to figure it ...yaak:<BR/>I typically use neither, trying to figure it out myself, until I encounter a problem, at which point I read both. I'll look for these stylistic differences in the future, though. Thanks for the heads up!<BR/><BR/>Meanwhile, what I'm using for the class is just the Maharzu's introduction, in which he discusses each of the <I>middot sheHaTorah nidreshet bahen</I> in turn. I like the technical discussions, but it probably will lose the more beginner part of the audience. So I'm going to try to temper it with a lot of learning the perek in Tanach inside, trying to get a feel for the tone, and seeing how it fits it with the drash.joshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06958375916391742462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-1120065489135203552005-06-29T13:18:00.000-04:002005-06-29T13:18:00.000-04:00Josh,I love Midrash Rabbah, but I've often found t...Josh,<BR/><BR/>I love Midrash Rabbah, but I've often found the Perush of the Etz Yosef to be more appealing than the Maharzo. The Maharzo seems too technical, and you need a lot of time to analyze which Midda he's using and why. That said, I suppose that if one had the time, and wanted to study Midrash BeIyun, it's something to look at.yaakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08179304707239865515noreply@blogger.com