tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post8245972623261408266..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: Berachot 20a: Rabbi Yochanan and Maternal Impressionjoshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-41264618284336921612012-08-21T19:28:31.012-04:002012-08-21T19:28:31.012-04:00That's interesting, I for some time think abou...That's interesting, I for some time think about origin of races. Can you recommend some book about origin of races? jewish or goiim author, (in english, because I don't read hebrew). Or you accept this classical theory, that blacks, whites, yellows originated from Noah?SPACEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05422724355730756799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-80182360490260115142012-08-21T11:21:08.650-04:002012-08-21T11:21:08.650-04:00not a euphemism. the very next sentence ends "...not a euphemism. the very next sentence ends "was based on incorrect science". does it really seem like i am resorting to euphemisms?<br /><br />the point i was making is that this science was only recently uprooted, such that at the time these particular Rishonim and Acharonim spoke / wrote, they still believed it to be true and indeed in line with a secular scientific worldview.joshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-54723514405491305642012-08-21T10:51:28.133-04:002012-08-21T10:51:28.133-04:00"which was only recently uprooted."
You...<i>"which was only recently uprooted."</i><br /><br />You have some funny euphemisms for "wrong."YAWnoreply@blogger.com