tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post697814231250034842..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: Commentators who live in glass houses, reduxjoshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-31427625108763207822013-11-13T02:00:04.327-05:002013-11-13T02:00:04.327-05:00Thanks! Yes, I should have mentioned this. I did n...Thanks! Yes, I should have mentioned this. I did note it a few weeks later, in a parenthetical note in a follow-up post... http://parsha.blogspot.com/2011/12/shadal-on-yitzchaki-and-eight-kings-of.htmljoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-88265353917395034662013-11-12T11:41:14.427-05:002013-11-12T11:41:14.427-05:00BTW in Divrei Hayamim Hadar is also called Hadad.BTW in Divrei Hayamim Hadar is also called Hadad.Yankelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-83947732172283612812011-12-09T13:13:19.909-05:002011-12-09T13:13:19.909-05:00Thank you for revisiting this topic. Great job as ...Thank you for revisiting this topic. Great job as usual. <br /><br />I would just add that perhaps like yourself the Ibn Ezra by the time he reached Devorim had also changed his views from when he wrote on Bereshis :)Znoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-28261075704790827602011-12-09T11:30:41.636-05:002011-12-09T11:30:41.636-05:00You've been blogging since 2003? That's am...You've been blogging since 2003? That's amazing! Chazak u-varuch!S.http://onthemainline.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-30141657224092968052011-12-09T10:30:53.842-05:002011-12-09T10:30:53.842-05:00R' Waxman,
The answer to the contradiction is ...R' Waxman,<br />The answer to the contradiction is obvious - clearly there was no "Ibn Ezra" and the works attributed to him are a compilation of different works from different anthers cobbled together (sometimes poorly) by a later editor.<br /><br />Seriously - since Ibn Ezra always refers to post-Mosaic phrases and verses as a secret, perhaps he was upset at Yitzchaki either because (i) Ibn Ezra had a tradition of some kind for his comments, and was against making changes based on sevara, or (ii) Ibn Ezra didn't mind secretively hinting at post-Mosaic authorship, but was against wholesale and explicit attacks on the text. <br /><br />KT,<br />HillelHillelnoreply@blogger.com