tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post1829101365815625653..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: Why does Rashi omit the word milchemet?joshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-57972314698870713932011-01-20T07:12:26.607-05:002011-01-20T07:12:26.607-05:00it is possible. certainly as a meaningful message....it is possible. certainly as a meaningful message. i've generally very conservative in making diyukim in Rashi. just to play devil's advocate, one could suggest, for example, that he had a preliminary halachic assessment, which was correct in the general case, but then got angry before further deliberation, and so did not arrive at a correct assessment of how this case was different, for the reason Aharon gave. this may, or may not, be akin to what you are saying, of attitude in approaching the problem like a bride and losing objective perspective.<br /><br />that comment there by josh, btw, is clearly spam. i've been spammed by the same site.<br /><br />kol tuv,<br />joshjoshwaxmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05149022516101476797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-69722342558940448582011-01-19T21:42:18.168-05:002011-01-19T21:42:18.168-05:00What do you think of the diyuq I made in Rashi in ...What do you think of the diyuq I made in Rashi in this post:<br />http://vesomsechel.blogspot.com/2009/07/anger-and-error.htmlRabbi Joshua Maroofhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12585369620887846940noreply@blogger.com