tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post113474175383968584..comments2024-03-05T21:22:43.426-05:00Comments on parshablog: parshat Vayishlach:The ta'am 'elyon and ta'am tachtonjoshwaxmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03516171362038454070noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-58185847619700457422008-12-15T02:59:00.000-05:002008-12-15T02:59:00.000-05:00i think rav breuer has a chapter on tis in his כתר...i think rav breuer has a chapter on tis in his כתר ארם צובה bookLion of Zionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10342299133387602141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5589564.post-39048497194142502982007-11-24T21:28:00.000-05:002007-11-24T21:28:00.000-05:00"The major dichotomies are often determined logica..."The major dichotomies are often determined logically (based on the meaning of the pasuk), while the minor dichotomies are determined mechanically based on syntax, and so the etnachta on אָבִ֑יו is a logical division, while the zakef on הַהִ֔וא is a syntactic division."<BR/><BR/>No, הַהִ֔וא is a logical division.<BR/>The reason for the difference in division between טעם עליון and טעם תחתון can be found in:<BR/>פרקי מועדות by Harav Mordechai Breuer, p. 395, footnote 23.jmorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10192154189355558964noreply@blogger.com